This Case Is
Built and Ready.
It Needs You.
The CMS Files investigation has produced a complete evidence base for a landmark public law case. The judicial admissions are in writing. The evidence bundle runs to 600+ pages across four published dossiers. The case law is identified. What this case needs is experienced legal representation.
What This Investigation
Has Already Established
The Core Admissions
- DWP FOI2026/50177 (25 June 2026): "This is the only document that constitutes the order" — confirming CMEL7298 is a CMS administrative template, not a court order
- GLD Z2500859 para 8 (Ryan Jummun, GLD): CMS served the summons — not the court. A judicial admission in live High Court proceedings.
- HMCTS officer Veer (email): No liability order on the court file for case reference 2400113035
- CMS recorded call (Exhibit CL2): "There are no court orders — they're memorandums"
- DWP IR2026/14071: DWP withholds its own Article 6 legal advice under LPP — confirming awareness of the problem
- Andrew Western MP (18 March 2026): ss.32M/32N CSA 1991 (admin LO regime) never commenced
Case Law Already Identified
- R v Manchester Stipendiary Magistrate ex parte Hill [1983] 1 AC 328 (HL): Summons not issued by court is void — jurisdictional nullity
- Tsfayo v United Kingdom [2006] ECHR 981: Body with financial interest in outcome cannot satisfy Article 6 impartiality
- Farley v Child Support Agency [2006] UKHL 31: s.33(4) bar on calculation challenge is absolute
- Three Rivers DC v Bank of England [2003] 2 AC 1: Misfeasance in public office test
- Christie v Leachinsky [1947] AC 573: Detention without lawful authority — false imprisonment
- Unison v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51: Denial of effective court access is unconstitutional
Where Legal Representation
Is Most Urgently Needed
Public Law / Administrative Law
The substantive High Court judicial review (AC-2025-LON-001412) requires advocacy at the permission and full hearing stages. The N161 appeal and N244 applications need direction. The strongest case for a judicial declaration that the CMS enforcement regime is unlawful.
Active case: AC-2025-LON-001412 · Administrative Court
Human Rights
Structural Article 6 ECHR incompatibility argument — bulk listings, Secretary of State as simultaneously creditor and enforcement authority, 20% surcharge interest, s.33(4) bar. Joint Committee on Human Rights referral made. A landmark HRA 1998 case with significant precedent value.
Tsfayo [2006] · Feldbrugge v Netherlands [1986]
Criminal Law
National Crime Agency referral covers Forgery and Counterfeiting Act 1981 (making and using false instruments), Fraud Act 2006, and POCA 2002. Criminal defence for paying parents wrongly prosecuted and imprisoned. Private prosecution potential where individual officials can be identified.
FCA 1981 ss.1,3 · Fraud Act 2006 ss.2,4,11 · POCA 2002
Group / Class Actions
790,000 paying parents have received enforcement instruments confirmed as administrative templates. Parents who have been imprisoned, had wages seized, had charging orders registered, or had credit damaged may have tortious claims for false imprisonment, conversion, and unlawful interference with property. Group litigation order potential.
GLO · collective proceedings · representative actions
Civil Damages
Individual cases of false imprisonment (parents imprisoned under void LOs), A1P1 deprivation (wages, property), and misfeasance in public office against named officials. C.J. — 42 days HMP Peterborough, void instrument, debt paid — is an immediate damages candidate.
Christie v Leachinsky · A1P1 ECHR · Three Rivers test
Procurement / Commercial
The TCS/CMS2012 procurement raises significant questions under the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 and Procurement Act 2023 — sole-source abuse, failure to conduct debarment assessments, contracts awarded after two major US IP theft findings. National Crime Agency referral covers this ground.
PCR 2015 reg.72 · Procurement Act 2023 · CMA jurisdiction
Funding Routes Available
- Legal Aid: Judicial review proceedings may attract legal aid where the merits and means tests are met. HLPAS (Housing and Legal Protection Advice Service) and equivalent public law specialists may be relevant.
- Conditional Fee Arrangement (CFA): Civil damages claims (false imprisonment, A1P1) may be appropriate for CFA where liability is strong and damages are demonstrable.
- Damages-Based Agreement (DBA): Where group litigation develops, DBA structures may be appropriate for the representative solicitors.
- Pro Bono: The public interest dimension of this case is significant. LSLO (Law Society Pro Bono), Advocate, and Bar Pro Bono Unit are all potential routes.
- Litigation funders: The scale of the case (790,000 affected individuals, £106m/yr identified revenue stream on void instruments) may attract third-party litigation funding.
- Journalism / Public Interest: This investigation has the support of published intelligence dossiers and an established media profile. Press coverage may support crowdfunding of legal costs.
What We Can Provide
- Complete evidence bundle — four published dossiers, all source documents
- All FOI responses, court correspondence, and filed documents
- Lay representation support during the interim period
- Media strategy support — press and parliamentary profile already established
- Witness statements from parents across England and Wales
- Access to the evidence portal — growing database of parent case statements
- Parliamentary contacts — W&P Committee, named MPs already engaged
- Full case timeline and all filed documents in AC-2025-LON-001412
Ready to Discuss
This Case?
Initial discussions are entirely confidential. We can provide a complete case briefing document under NDA to any firm considering involvement. No commitment required to explore the case.
thebigchildmaintenancescandal@gmail.com
Subject line: LEGAL ENQUIRY — [FIRM NAME]
All enquiries handled by Christina Little, researcher and lay representative in AC-2025-LON-001412. Response within 48 hours.